Evaluating Indonesia's Policy Framework for Protecting Migrant Workers A Human Rights-Based Diplomatic Approach

Authors

  • Kananita Saras Anggitadewi Saras Universitas Pertahanan RI
  • Anang Puji Utama
  • Herlina Juni Risma Saragih
  • Rachmat Setiawibawa
  • Arifuddin Uksan

Abstract

This study evaluates the policy framework adopted by Indonesia in safeguarding the rights and welfare of its migrant workers through the lens of human rights-based diplomacy. The inquiry is motivated by the persistent vulnerability of Indonesian migrant workers to various forms of exploitation, including labor abuse, wage theft, contract violations, and human trafficking, despite the considerable economic contributions these workers make through remittance flows to national development. Employing a descriptive-analytical literature review methodology, this research draws on peer-reviewed academic journals, official documents from international organizations, national legislation, and relevant studies in the fields of migration governance and protective diplomacy. The analytical framework integrates three theoretical pillars: the rights-based approach, consular and protective diplomacy theory, and the concept of human security. Findings reveal that Indonesia has undergone a significant paradigm shift in its migration governance, most notably through the enactment of Law Number 18 of 2017, which repositions migrant workers as rights-bearing subjects entitled to comprehensive state protection across all phases of the migration cycle. Additionally, Indonesia has engaged in progressively active bilateral, regional, and multilateral diplomacy to elevate the standards of migrant worker protection in destination countries. Nevertheless, structural challenges persist, including interagency coordination deficits, high rates of non-procedural placement, limited protective capacity in overseas diplomatic missions, and an imbalanced bargaining position relative to receiving states. At the regional and global levels, Indonesian diplomacy continues to encounter constraints arising from the predominantly non-binding character of most international instruments. The study concludes that effective migrant worker protection necessitates deeper integration between domestic policy and multi-level, rights-based diplomacy. Strengthening institutional capacity, harmonizing regulatory frameworks, and optimizing coalition-based diplomacy represent the most strategic pathways toward enhancing the effectiveness of Indonesia's international migrant protection regime.

References

Adams, W. (2018). Human rights and global labor migration governance. Journal of International Migration Studies.

Amnesty International. (2020). Exploitation and abuse of migrant domestic workers in Asia. Amnesty International Report.

Arifin, Z. (2020). Governance challenges in Indonesian migrant worker protection. Journal of Southeast Asian Public Policy.

Asis, M. B., & Feraru, A. (2021). Labour migration governance in ASEAN: Gaps and opportunities. Asian Journal of Political Science.

Azmy, F., & Dewi, S. (2019). Optimizing the role of the state in protecting Indonesian migrant workers. Journal of Global Policy.

Ball, R., & Piper, N. (2017). Collaborative regional governance and migrant workers: Lessons from the Colombo Process. Migration and Development.

Biao, X. (2018). The recruitment regime: Networks and brokerage in labor migration. Global Labour Journal.

Black, R., & Crush, J. (2019). Policy gaps in migrant labour regimes in Southeast Asia. International Migration Review.

Boucher, A. (2019). Measuring migrant worker protections: State capacity and policy design. Global Policy.

Cerna, L. (2019). Labour migration policies and protection debates. Journal of Public Policy.

Ford, M., Lyons, L., & Van Schendel, W. (2012). Labour migration and human trafficking in Southeast Asia. Routledge.

Ford, M., Lyons, L., & Van Schendel, W. (2019). Migrant labor, the state, and the politics of protection. Critical Asian Studies.

Ford, M., & Lyons, L. (2018). Consular protection and the politics of migrant labor. Pacific Affairs, 91(2), 301–320.

Ford, M., & Lyons, L. (2019). Reintegration and the limits of migrant protection. Development and Change.

Gaddis, G., & Alter, K. (2022). Structural constraints in global migrant labor governance. World Politics.

Gomez, J. (2019). Rights-based approach to migrant protection in ASEAN. Contemporary Southeast Asia.

Harima, K. (2020). The evolution of Indonesia's migrant worker governance. Asian Labour Review.

Hernández, A. (2019). Norm diffusion and the ASEAN Consensus on Migrant Workers. Asia Pacific Law Review.

ILO. (2015). Forced labour, human trafficking and slavery. International Labour Organization.

ILO. (2021). Enhancing migrant worker protection: Governance challenges in Southeast Asia. ILO Working Paper.

IOM. (2022). Migration in Indonesia: Challenges and opportunities for worker protection. International Organization for Migration Report.

Ismail, S., & Dumanig, F. (2020). Regional governance and migrant labour protection in ASEAN. Asian Journal of Social Science.

Kneebone, S. (2020). The rule of law, protection, and the migration-security nexus. International Journal of Refugee Law, 32(1), 1–24.

Koser, K. (2019). Global migration governance after the GCM. Journal of Global Affairs.

Lindquist, J. (2020). Brokers and the state in Indonesian labour migration. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies.

Lindquist, J., Xiang, B., & Yeoh, B. S. A. (2012). Opening the black box of migration: Brokers, the organization of transnational mobility and the changing political economy in Asia. Pacific Affairs, 85(1), 7–19.

McKenzie, D. (2019). Recruitment fees, exploitation, and migrant outcomes. World Development.

Melissen, J. (2011). Beyond the new public diplomacy. Clingendael Paper No. 3. Netherlands Institute of International Relations.

Miles, T. (2021). Technical cooperation and migrant worker protection in ASEAN. ILO Working Paper Series.

Newman, E. (2016). Human security: Reconciling comprehensive and targeted approaches. Review of International Studies, 42(1), 123–144.

Nugroho, R. (2021). Implementing migrant worker protection policy through a human rights lens. Journal of Government Studies.

Palmer, W., & Missbach, A. (2019). Irregularity and non-procedural migration: Recruitment agents and Indonesian overseas workers. Asian Studies Review.

Palmer, W., Missbach, A., & Rudge, T. (2020). Labour broker networks and the informalization of migration in Indonesia. Mobilities.

Piper, N. (2013). Feminisation of migration and the social dimensions of development: The Asian case. Third World Quarterly, 29(7), 1287–1303.

Piper, N., & Foley, L. (2020). Migrant workers and access to justice: A gendered analysis. Social & Legal Studies.

Piper, N., & Iredale, R. (2021). The politics of migrant labour rights. International Labour Review.

Rahman, M. (2020). The Abu Dhabi Dialogue and migrant worker diplomacy in Asia. Migration Studies.

Renshaw, C. (2015). The ASEAN human rights declaration 2012. Human Rights Law Review, 13(3), 557–579.

Riggirozzi, P., & Grugel, J. (2015). Regional governance and social policy in the Global South. Third World Quarterly.

Syafitri, W. (2020). Migrant workers and policy implementation challenges in Indonesia. Indonesian Population Journal.

Tirtosudarmo, R. (2018). Migration, state, and social protection in Indonesia. Indonesia and the Malay World.

UN Women. (2021). Female migrant workers and the limits of social protection: Southeast Asian evidence. UN Women Report.

UNDP. (1994). Human development report 1994: New dimensions of human security. United Nations Development Programme.

Williams, C. (2019). Global labour mobility and the future of migrant protection. Journal of International Affairs.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-13

Issue

Section

Articles